lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 26 Jun 2021 22:53:23 +0200
From:   Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
        Martin Varghese <martin.varghese@...ia.com>,
        Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
        Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>,
        Andreas Schultz <aschultz@...p.net>,
        Jonas Bonn <jonas@...rbonn.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: reset MAC header consistently across
 L3 virtual devices

On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 11:50:19AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 6/25/21 7:32 AM, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> > Some virtual L3 devices, like vxlan-gpe and gre (in collect_md mode),
> > reset the MAC header pointer after they parsed the outer headers. This
> > accurately reflects the fact that the decapsulated packet is pure L3
> > packet, as that makes the MAC header 0 bytes long (the MAC and network
> > header pointers are equal).
> > 
> > However, many L3 devices only adjust the network header after
> > decapsulation and leave the MAC header pointer to its original value.
> > This can confuse other parts of the networking stack, like TC, which
> > then considers the outer headers as one big MAC header.
> > 
> > This patch series makes the following L3 tunnels behave like VXLAN-GPE:
> > bareudp, ipip, sit, gre, ip6gre, ip6tnl, gtp.
> > 
> > The case of gre is a bit special. It already resets the MAC header
> > pointer in collect_md mode, so only the classical mode needs to be
> > adjusted. However, gre also has a special case that expects the MAC
> > header pointer to keep pointing to the outer header even after
> > decapsulation. Therefore, patch 4 keeps an exception for this case.
> > 
> > Ideally, we'd centralise the call to skb_reset_mac_header() in
> > ip_tunnel_rcv(), to avoid manual calls in ipip (patch 2),
> > sit (patch 3) and gre (patch 4). That's unfortunately not feasible
> > currently, because of the gre special case discussed above that
> > precludes us from resetting the MAC header unconditionally.
> 
> What about adding a flag to ip_tunnel indicating if it can be done (or
> should not be done since doing it is the most common)?

That's feasible. I didn't do it here because I wanted to keep the
patch series focused on L3 tunnels. Modifying ip_tunnel_rcv()'s
prototype would also require updating erspan_rcv(), which isn't L3
(erspan carries Ethernet frames). I was feeling such consolidation
would be best done in a follow up patch series.

I can repost if you feel strongly about it. Otherwise, I'll follow up
with the ip_tunnel_rcv() consolidation in a later patch. Just let me
know if you have any preference.

> > The original motivation is to redirect bareudp packets to Ethernet
> > devices (as described in patch 1). The rest of this series aims at
> > bringing consistency across all L3 devices (apart from gre's special
> > case unfortunately).
> 
> Can you add a selftests that covers the use cases you mention in the
> commit logs?

I'm already having a selftests for most of the tunnels (and their
different operating modes), gtp being the main exception. But it's not
yet ready for upstream, as I'm trying to move the topology in its own
.sh file, to keep the main selftests as simple as possible.
I'll post it as soon as I get it in good shape.

Thanks for the rewiew.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ