netdev - [PATCH] Bluetooth: call lock_sock() outside of spinlock section

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 27 Jun 2021 22:11:34 +0900
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
        linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Lin Ma <linma@....edu.cn>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: [PATCH] Bluetooth: call lock_sock() outside of spinlock section

syzbot is hitting might_sleep() warning at hci_sock_dev_event() due to
calling lock_sock() with rw spinlock held [1]. Defer calling lock_sock()
via sock_hold().

Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a5df189917e79d5e59c9 [1]
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+a5df189917e79d5e59c9@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Tested-by: syzbot <syzbot+a5df189917e79d5e59c9@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Fixes: e305509e678b3a4a ("Bluetooth: use correct lock to prevent UAF of hdev object")
---
 net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
index eed0dd066e12..64e54ab0892f 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
@@ -759,19 +759,39 @@ void hci_sock_dev_event(struct hci_dev *hdev, int event)
 	if (event == HCI_DEV_UNREG) {
 		struct sock *sk;
 
+restart:
 		/* Detach sockets from device */
 		read_lock(&hci_sk_list.lock);
 		sk_for_each(sk, &hci_sk_list.head) {
+			/* hci_sk_list.lock is preventing hci_sock_release()
+			 * from calling bt_sock_unlink().
+			 */
+			if (hci_pi(sk)->hdev != hdev || sk_unhashed(sk))
+				continue;
+			/* Take a ref because we can't call lock_sock() with
+			 * hci_sk_list.lock held.
+			 */
+			sock_hold(sk);
+			read_unlock(&hci_sk_list.lock);
 			lock_sock(sk);
-			if (hci_pi(sk)->hdev == hdev) {
+			/* Since hci_sock_release() might have already called
+			 * bt_sock_unlink() while waiting for lock_sock(),
+			 * use sk_hashed(sk) for checking that bt_sock_unlink()
+			 * is not yet called.
+			 */
+			if (sk_hashed(sk) && hci_pi(sk)->hdev == hdev) {
 				hci_pi(sk)->hdev = NULL;
 				sk->sk_err = EPIPE;
 				sk->sk_state = BT_OPEN;
 				sk->sk_state_change(sk);
-
 				hci_dev_put(hdev);
 			}
 			release_sock(sk);
+			sock_put(sk);
+			/* Restarting is safe, for hci_pi(sk)->hdev is now NULL
+			 * if condition met and will "continue;" otherwise.
+			 */
+			goto restart;
 		}
 		read_unlock(&hci_sk_list.lock);
 	}
-- 
2.18.4