[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210629110923.580029-1-toke@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 13:09:23 +0200
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: ignore .eh_frame sections when parsing elf files
The .eh_frame and .rel.eh_frame sections will be present in BPF object
files when compiled using a multi-stage compile pipe like in samples/bpf.
This produces errors when loading such a file with libbpf. While the errors
are technically harmless, they look odd and confuse users. So add .eh_frame
sections to is_sec_name_dwarf() so they will also be ignored by libbpf
processing. This gets rid of output like this from samples/bpf:
libbpf: elf: skipping unrecognized data section(32) .eh_frame
libbpf: elf: skipping relo section(33) .rel.eh_frame for section(32) .eh_frame
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 1e04ce724240..676af6be5961 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -2906,7 +2906,8 @@ static Elf_Data *elf_sec_data(const struct bpf_object *obj, Elf_Scn *scn)
static bool is_sec_name_dwarf(const char *name)
{
/* approximation, but the actual list is too long */
- return strncmp(name, ".debug_", sizeof(".debug_") - 1) == 0;
+ return (strncmp(name, ".debug_", sizeof(".debug_") - 1) == 0 ||
+ strncmp(name, ".eh_frame", sizeof(".eh_frame") - 1) == 0);
}
static bool ignore_elf_section(GElf_Shdr *hdr, const char *name)
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists