netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] gve: Fixes and clean-up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Jul 2021 19:42:48 +0200
From:   Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To:     Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@...gle.com>
Cc:     csully@...gle.com, sagis@...gle.com, jonolson@...gle.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, awogbemila@...gle.com,
        willemb@...gle.com, yangchun@...gle.com, bcf@...gle.com,
        kuozhao@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] gve: Fixes and clean-up

Le 01/07/2021 à 18:20, Jeroen de Borst a écrit :
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 10:58 PM Christophe JAILLET
> <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote:
>>
>> This serie is part of the effort to axe the wrappers in
>> include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h
>>
>> While looking at it, I spotted:
>>    - a resource leak in an error handling path (patch 1)
>>    - an error code that could be propagated. (patch 2)
>>      This patch could be ignored. It's only goal is to be more consistent
>>      with other drivers.
>>
>> These 2 paches are not related to the 'pci-dma-compat.h' stuff, which can
>> be found in patch 3.
>>
>> Christophe JAILLET (3):
>>    gve: Fix an error handling path in 'gve_probe()'
>>    gve: Propagate error codes to caller
>>    gve: Simplify code and axe the use of a deprecated API
>>
>>
> 
> Thanks for these patches.
> 
> Can split this into 2 patch series;

Sure.

> one for net (with the first 2
> patches) and one for net-next (with the cleanup one)?

I've never worked with net and net-next directly.
If just adding net and net-next after [PATCH] in the subject of the 
mail, yes, I can do it if it helps.


BTW, I gave a look at https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/
The patch 1/3 is marked as failed because "1 blamed authors not CCed: 
lrizzo@...gle.com; 1 maintainers not CCed: lrizzo@...gle.com"

This author/blame was not spotted by get_maintainer.pl. Is it something 
I should worry about?


> Also the label in the first patch should probably read
> 'abort_with_gve_init' instead of 'abort_with_vge_init'.

Good catch. Sorry about that.

> 
> Jeroen
> 

CJ