netdev - [PATCH net 6/8] bonding: disallow setting nested bonding + ipsec offload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210702142648.7677-7-ap420073@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri,  2 Jul 2021 14:26:46 +0000
From:   Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, j.vosburgh@...il.com,
        vfalico@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
        anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, jarod@...hat.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Cc:     ap420073@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH net 6/8] bonding: disallow setting nested bonding + ipsec offload

bonding interface can be nested and it supports ipsec offload.
So, it allows setting the nested bonding + ipsec scenario.
But code does not support this scenario.
So, it should be disallowed.

interface graph:
bond2
 |
bond1
 |
eth0

The nested bonding + ipsec offload may not a real usecase.
So, disallowing this is fine.

Fixes: 18cb261afd7b ("bonding: support hardware encryption offload to slaves")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 7659e1fab19e..f268e67cb2f0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -419,8 +419,9 @@ static int bond_ipsec_add_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
 	xs->xso.real_dev = slave->dev;
 	bond->xs = xs;
 
-	if (!(slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops
-	      && slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add)) {
+	if (!slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
+	    !slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add ||
+	    netif_is_bond_master(slave->dev)) {
 		slave_warn(bond_dev, slave->dev, "Slave does not support ipsec offload\n");
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -453,8 +454,9 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
 
 	xs->xso.real_dev = slave->dev;
 
-	if (!(slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops
-	      && slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete)) {
+	if (!slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
+	    !slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete ||
+	    netif_is_bond_master(slave->dev)) {
 		slave_warn(bond_dev, slave->dev, "%s: no slave xdo_dev_state_delete\n", __func__);
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -479,8 +481,9 @@ static bool bond_ipsec_offload_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *xs)
 	if (BOND_MODE(bond) != BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP)
 		return true;
 
-	if (!(slave_dev->xfrmdev_ops
-	      && slave_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_offload_ok)) {
+	if (!slave_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
+	    !slave_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_offload_ok ||
+	    netif_is_bond_master(slave_dev)) {
 		slave_warn(bond_dev, slave_dev, "%s: no slave xdo_dev_offload_ok\n", __func__);
 		return false;
 	}
-- 
2.17.1