lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210704190252.11866-3-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun,  4 Jul 2021 12:02:43 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
        Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/11] sock_map: lift socket state restriction for datagram sockets

From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>

TCP and other connection oriented sockets have accept()
for each incoming connection on the server side, hence
they can just insert those fd's from accept() to sockmap,
which are of course established.

Now with datagram sockets begin to support sockmap and
redirection, the restriction is no longer applicable to
them, as they have no accept(). So we have to lift this
restriction for them. This is fine, because inside
bpf_sk_redirect_map() we still have another socket status
check, sock_map_redirect_allowed(), as a guard.

This also means they do not have to be removed from
sockmap when disconnecting.

Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Cc: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
---
 net/core/sock_map.c                           | 21 +------------------
 net/ipv4/udp_bpf.c                            |  1 -
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c |  8 ++++---
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sock_map.c b/net/core/sock_map.c
index 60decd6420ca..3c427e7e6df9 100644
--- a/net/core/sock_map.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
@@ -211,8 +211,6 @@ static struct sk_psock *sock_map_psock_get_checked(struct sock *sk)
 	return psock;
 }
 
-static bool sock_map_redirect_allowed(const struct sock *sk);
-
 static int sock_map_link(struct bpf_map *map, struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct sk_psock_progs *progs = sock_map_progs(map);
@@ -223,13 +221,6 @@ static int sock_map_link(struct bpf_map *map, struct sock *sk)
 	struct sk_psock *psock;
 	int ret;
 
-	/* Only sockets we can redirect into/from in BPF need to hold
-	 * refs to parser/verdict progs and have their sk_data_ready
-	 * and sk_write_space callbacks overridden.
-	 */
-	if (!sock_map_redirect_allowed(sk))
-		goto no_progs;
-
 	stream_verdict = READ_ONCE(progs->stream_verdict);
 	if (stream_verdict) {
 		stream_verdict = bpf_prog_inc_not_zero(stream_verdict);
@@ -264,7 +255,6 @@ static int sock_map_link(struct bpf_map *map, struct sock *sk)
 		}
 	}
 
-no_progs:
 	psock = sock_map_psock_get_checked(sk);
 	if (IS_ERR(psock)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(psock);
@@ -527,12 +517,6 @@ static bool sk_is_tcp(const struct sock *sk)
 	       sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP;
 }
 
-static bool sk_is_udp(const struct sock *sk)
-{
-	return sk->sk_type == SOCK_DGRAM &&
-	       sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_UDP;
-}
-
 static bool sock_map_redirect_allowed(const struct sock *sk)
 {
 	if (sk_is_tcp(sk))
@@ -550,10 +534,7 @@ static bool sock_map_sk_state_allowed(const struct sock *sk)
 {
 	if (sk_is_tcp(sk))
 		return (1 << sk->sk_state) & (TCPF_ESTABLISHED | TCPF_LISTEN);
-	else if (sk_is_udp(sk))
-		return sk_hashed(sk);
-
-	return false;
+	return true;
 }
 
 static int sock_hash_update_common(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/udp_bpf.c
index 45b8782aec0c..cb1d113ce6fd 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp_bpf.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp_bpf.c
@@ -112,7 +112,6 @@ static struct proto udp_bpf_prots[UDP_BPF_NUM_PROTS];
 static void udp_bpf_rebuild_protos(struct proto *prot, const struct proto *base)
 {
 	*prot        = *base;
-	prot->unhash = sock_map_unhash;
 	prot->close  = sock_map_close;
 	prot->recvmsg = udp_bpf_recvmsg;
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c
index 515229f24a93..b8934ae694e5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c
@@ -351,9 +351,11 @@ static void test_insert_opened(int family, int sotype, int mapfd)
 	errno = 0;
 	value = s;
 	err = bpf_map_update_elem(mapfd, &key, &value, BPF_NOEXIST);
-	if (!err || errno != EOPNOTSUPP)
-		FAIL_ERRNO("map_update: expected EOPNOTSUPP");
-
+	if (sotype == SOCK_STREAM) {
+		if (!err || errno != EOPNOTSUPP)
+			FAIL_ERRNO("map_update: expected EOPNOTSUPP");
+	} else if (err)
+		FAIL_ERRNO("map_update: expected success");
 	xclose(s);
 }
 
-- 
2.27.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ