[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210705140505-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 14:08:22 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jasowang@...hat.com, dingxiaoxiong@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio_net: check virtqueue_add_sgs() return value
On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 09:53:39PM +0800, wangyunjian wrote:
> From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
>
> As virtqueue_add_sgs() can fail, we should check the return value.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1464439 ("Unchecked return value")
> Fixes: a7c58146cf9a ("virtio_net: don't crash if virtqueue is broken.")
What does this have to do with it?
> Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index b0b81458ca94..2b852578551e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -1743,6 +1743,7 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd,
> {
> struct scatterlist *sgs[4], hdr, stat;
> unsigned out_num = 0, tmp;
> + int ret;
>
> /* Caller should know better */
> BUG_ON(!virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ));
> @@ -1762,7 +1763,9 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd,
> sgs[out_num] = &stat;
>
> BUG_ON(out_num + 1 > ARRAY_SIZE(sgs));
> - virtqueue_add_sgs(vi->cvq, sgs, out_num, 1, vi, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + ret = virtqueue_add_sgs(vi->cvq, sgs, out_num, 1, vi, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return false;
and maybe dev_warn here. these things should not happen.
>
> if (unlikely(!virtqueue_kick(vi->cvq)))
> return vi->ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK;
> --
> 2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists