netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] refactor the ringtest testing for ptr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210705143952-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 5 Jul 2021 14:42:18 -0400
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, jasowang@...hat.com, nickhu@...estech.com,
        green.hu@...il.com, deanbo422@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        yury.norov@...il.com, ojeda@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...ogle.com,
        joe@...ches.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] refactor the ringtest testing for ptr_ring

On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 09:36:26PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 02:26:32PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 08:06:50PM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> > > On 2021/7/5 17:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 11:57:33AM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> > > >> tools/include/* have a lot of abstract layer for building
> > > >> kernel code from userspace, so reuse or add the abstract
> > > >> layer in tools/include/ to build the ptr_ring for ringtest
> > > >> testing.
> > > > 
> > > > ...
> > > > 
> > > >>  create mode 100644 tools/include/asm/cache.h
> > > >>  create mode 100644 tools/include/asm/processor.h
> > > >>  create mode 100644 tools/include/generated/autoconf.h
> > > >>  create mode 100644 tools/include/linux/align.h
> > > >>  create mode 100644 tools/include/linux/cache.h
> > > >>  create mode 100644 tools/include/linux/slab.h
> > > > 
> > > > Maybe somebody can change this to be able to include in-tree headers directly?
> > > 
> > > If the above works, maybe the files in tools/include/* is not
> > > necessary any more, just use the in-tree headers to compile
> > > the user space app?
> > > 
> > > Or I missed something here?
> > 
> > why would it work? kernel headers outside of uapi are not
> > intended to be consumed by userspace.
> 
> The problem here, that we are almost getting two copies of the headers, and
> tools are not in a good maintenance, so it's often desynchronized from the
> actual Linux headers. This will become more and more diverse if we keep same
> way of operation. So, I would rather NAK any new copies of the headers from
> include/ to tools/include.

We already have the copies
yes they are not maintained well ... what's the plan then?
NAK won't help us improve the situation.
I would say copies are kind of okay just make sure they are
built with kconfig. Then any breakage will be
detected.

> > > > Besides above, had you tested this with `make O=...`?
> > > 
> > > You are right, the generated/autoconf.h is in another directory
> > > with `make O=...`.
> > > 
> > > Any nice idea to fix the above problem?
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>