[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210705153814.11453-9-ap420073@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 15:38:13 +0000
From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, dsahern@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, j.vosburgh@...il.com, vfalico@...il.com,
andy@...yhouse.net, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, jarod@...hat.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Cc: ap420073@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH net v2 8/9] bonding: fix suspicious RCU usage in bond_ipsec_offload_ok()
To dereference bond->curr_active_slave, it uses rcu_dereference().
But it and the caller doesn't acquire RCU so a warning occurs.
So add rcu_read_lock().
Splat looks like:
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.13.0-rc6+ #1179 Not tainted
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:571 suspicious
rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
1 lock held by ping/974:
#0: ffff888109e7db70 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0},
at: raw_sendmsg+0x1303/0x2cb0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 974 Comm: ping Not tainted 5.13.0-rc6+ #1179
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0xa4/0xe5
bond_ipsec_offload_ok+0x1f4/0x260 [bonding]
xfrm_output+0x179/0x890
xfrm4_output+0xfa/0x410
? __xfrm4_output+0x4b0/0x4b0
? __ip_make_skb+0xecc/0x2030
? xfrm4_udp_encap_rcv+0x800/0x800
? ip_local_out+0x21/0x3a0
ip_send_skb+0x37/0xa0
raw_sendmsg+0x1bfd/0x2cb0
Fixes: 18cb261afd7b ("bonding: support hardware encryption offload to slaves")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
---
- no change
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 9c44ec92eb72..a9cb06959320 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -573,24 +573,34 @@ static bool bond_ipsec_offload_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *xs)
struct net_device *real_dev;
struct slave *curr_active;
struct bonding *bond;
+ int err;
bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
+ rcu_read_lock();
curr_active = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
real_dev = curr_active->dev;
- if (BOND_MODE(bond) != BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP)
- return true;
+ if (BOND_MODE(bond) != BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) {
+ err = true;
+ goto out;
+ }
- if (!xs->xso.real_dev)
- return false;
+ if (!xs->xso.real_dev) {
+ err = false;
+ goto out;
+ }
if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_offload_ok ||
netif_is_bond_master(real_dev)) {
- return false;
+ err = false;
+ goto out;
}
- return real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_offload_ok(skb, xs);
+ err = real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_offload_ok(skb, xs);
+out:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return err;
}
static const struct xfrmdev_ops bond_xfrmdev_ops = {
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists