netdev - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 130/160] sfc: error code if SRIOV cannot be disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210706111827.2060499-130-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue,  6 Jul 2021 07:17:56 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 130/160] sfc: error code if SRIOV cannot be disabled

From: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit 1ebe4feb8b442884f5a28d2437040096723dd1ea ]

If SRIOV cannot be disabled during device removal or module unloading,
return error code so it can be logged properly in the calling function.

Note that this can only happen if any VF is currently attached to a
guest using Xen, but not with vfio/KVM. Despite that in that case the
VFs won't work properly with PF removed and/or the module unloaded, I
have let it as is because I don't know what side effects may have
changing it, and also it seems to be the same that other drivers are
doing in this situation.

In the case of being called during SRIOV reconfiguration, the behavior
hasn't changed because the function is called with force=false.

Signed-off-by: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c
index a5d28b0f75ba..84041cd587d7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10_sriov.c
@@ -402,12 +402,17 @@ static int efx_ef10_pci_sriov_enable(struct efx_nic *efx, int num_vfs)
 	return rc;
 }
 
+/* Disable SRIOV and remove VFs
+ * If some VFs are attached to a guest (using Xen, only) nothing is
+ * done if force=false, and vports are freed if force=true (for the non
+ * attachedc ones, only) but SRIOV is not disabled and VFs are not
+ * removed in either case.
+ */
 static int efx_ef10_pci_sriov_disable(struct efx_nic *efx, bool force)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *dev = efx->pci_dev;
-	unsigned int vfs_assigned = 0;
-
-	vfs_assigned = pci_vfs_assigned(dev);
+	unsigned int vfs_assigned = pci_vfs_assigned(dev);
+	int rc = 0;
 
 	if (vfs_assigned && !force) {
 		netif_info(efx, drv, efx->net_dev, "VFs are assigned to guests; "
@@ -417,10 +422,12 @@ static int efx_ef10_pci_sriov_disable(struct efx_nic *efx, bool force)
 
 	if (!vfs_assigned)
 		pci_disable_sriov(dev);
+	else
+		rc = -EBUSY;
 
 	efx_ef10_sriov_free_vf_vswitching(efx);
 	efx->vf_count = 0;
-	return 0;
+	return rc;
 }
 
 int efx_ef10_sriov_configure(struct efx_nic *efx, int num_vfs)
-- 
2.30.2