[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YOSb1+yeVeLxiSRc@yoga>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 13:08:18 -0500
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org,
industrypack-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-ntb@...glegroups.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] bus: Make remove callback return void
On Tue 06 Jul 10:48 CDT 2021, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> The driver core ignores the return value of this callback because there
> is only little it can do when a device disappears.
>
> This is the final bit of a long lasting cleanup quest where several
> buses were converted to also return void from their remove callback.
> Additionally some resource leaks were fixed that were caused by drivers
> returning an error code in the expectation that the driver won't go
> away.
>
> With struct bus_type::remove returning void it's prevented that newly
> implemented buses return an ignored error code and so don't anticipate
> wrong expectations for driver authors.
>
Thanks for doing this!
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> (rpmsg and apr)
[..]
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> index c1404d3dae2c..7f6fac618ab2 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ static int rpmsg_dev_probe(struct device *dev)
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int rpmsg_dev_remove(struct device *dev)
> +static void rpmsg_dev_remove(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = to_rpmsg_device(dev);
> struct rpmsg_driver *rpdrv = to_rpmsg_driver(rpdev->dev.driver);
> @@ -546,8 +546,6 @@ static int rpmsg_dev_remove(struct device *dev)
>
> if (rpdev->ept)
> rpmsg_destroy_ept(rpdev->ept);
> -
> - return err;
This leaves err assigned but never used, but I don't mind following up
with a patch cleaning that up after this has landed.
> }
>
> static struct bus_type rpmsg_bus = {
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists