| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210706190253.GA23236@pc-32.home>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 21:02:53 +0200
From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] selftests: forwarding: Test redirecting gre
or ipip packets to Ethernet
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 09:38:44AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 7/1/21 8:59 AM, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> > I first tried to write this selftest using VRFs, but there were some
> > problems that made me switch to namespaces (I don't remember precisely
> > which ones, probably virtual tunnel devices in collect_md mode).
>
> if you hit a problem with the test not working, send me the test script
> and I will take a look.
So I've looked again at what it'd take to make a VRF-based selftest.
The problem is that we currently can't create collect_md tunnel
interfaces in different VRFs, if the VRFs are part of the same netns.
Most tunnels explicitely refuse to create a collect_md device if
another one already exists in the netns, no matter the rest of the
tunnel parameters. This is the behaviour of ip_gre, ipip, ip6_gre and
ip6_tunnel.
Then there's sit, which allows the creation of the second collect_md
device in the other VRF. However, iproute2 doesn't set the
IFLA_IPTUN_LINK attribute when it creates an external device, so it
can't set up such a configuration.
Bareudp simply doesn't support VRF.
Finally, vxlan allows devices with different IFLA_VXLAN_LINK attributes
to be created, but only when VXLAN_F_IPV6_LINKLOCAL is set. Removing
the VXLAN_F_IPV6_LINKLOCAL test at the end of vxlan_config_validate()
is enough to make two VXLAN-GPE devices work in a multi-VRF setup:
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
@@ -3767,8 +3767,7 @@ static int vxlan_config_validate(struct net *src_net, struct vxlan_config *conf,
(conf->flags & (VXLAN_F_RCV_FLAGS | VXLAN_F_IPV6)))
continue;
- if ((conf->flags & VXLAN_F_IPV6_LINKLOCAL) &&
- tmp->cfg.remote_ifindex != conf->remote_ifindex)
+ if (tmp->cfg.remote_ifindex != conf->remote_ifindex)
continue;
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
Here's an example of what a full selftests looks like using VXLAN-GPE.
Without the patch above, creating the second vxlan interface fails
(EEXIST).
#!/bin/bash
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
NUM_NETIFS=6
source lib.sh
VETH_H1_RTA=${NETIFS[p1]}
VETH_RTA_H1=${NETIFS[p2]}
VETH_RTA_RTB=${NETIFS[p3]}
VETH_RTB_RTA=${NETIFS[p4]}
VETH_RTB_H2=${NETIFS[p5]}
VETH_H2_RTB=${NETIFS[p6]}
MAC_H1_RTA=$(mac_get "${VETH_H1_RTA}")
MAC_RTA_H1=$(mac_get "${VETH_RTA_H1}")
MAC_RTB_H2=$(mac_get "${VETH_RTB_H2}")
MAC_H2_RTB=$(mac_get "${VETH_H2_RTB}")
VRF_H1="vrf-h1"
VRF_RTA="vrf-rta"
VRF_RTB="vrf-rtb"
VRF_H2="vrf-h2"
# Set up a chain of 4 VRFs connected with the veth interfaces:
# H1 <-> RTA <-> RTB <-> H2
setup_base_net()
{
# Initialise VRFs
vrf_prepare
for VRF in "${VRF_H1}" "${VRF_RTA}" "${VRF_RTB}" "${VRF_H2}"; do
vrf_create "${VRF}"
ip link set dev "${VRF}" up
done
# Assign each veth to its VRF
__simple_if_init "${VETH_H1_RTA}" "${VRF_H1}"
__simple_if_init "${VETH_RTA_H1}" "${VRF_RTA}"
__simple_if_init "${VETH_RTA_RTB}" "${VRF_RTA}"
__simple_if_init "${VETH_RTB_RTA}" "${VRF_RTB}"
__simple_if_init "${VETH_RTB_H2}" "${VRF_RTB}"
__simple_if_init "${VETH_H2_RTB}" "${VRF_H2}"
# Let each veth communicate with its peer
ip address add dev "${VETH_H1_RTA}" 192.0.2.0x1a peer 192.0.2.0xa1/32
ip address add dev "${VETH_RTA_H1}" 192.0.2.0xa1 peer 192.0.2.0x1a/32
ip address add dev "${VETH_RTA_RTB}" 192.0.2.0xab peer 192.0.2.0xba/32
ip address add dev "${VETH_RTB_RTA}" 192.0.2.0xba peer 192.0.2.0xab/32
ip address add dev "${VETH_RTB_H2}" 192.0.2.0xb2 peer 192.0.2.0x2b/32
ip address add dev "${VETH_H2_RTB}" 192.0.2.0x2b peer 192.0.2.0xb2/32
# Define host IPs for H1 and H2 and route them through RTA and RTB.
# Don't set up routing inside RTA and RTB yet.
ip address add 198.51.100.1/32 dev "${VETH_H1_RTA}"
ip address add 198.51.100.2/32 dev "${VETH_H2_RTB}"
ip route add 198.51.100.2/32 src 198.51.100.1 via 192.0.2.0xa1 \
vrf "${VRF_H1}"
ip route add 198.51.100.1/32 src 198.51.100.2 via 192.0.2.0xb2 \
vrf "${VRF_H2}"
}
# Route H1 and H2 host IPs inside RTA and RTB using VXLAN-GPE encapsulation.
setup_vxlan_gpe()
{
# Create an external VXLAN-GPE device in the intermediate VRFs
ip link add name tunnel-rta up type vxlan \
dev "${VRF_RTA}" gpe external
ip link add name tunnel-rtb up type vxlan \
dev "${VRF_RTB}" gpe external
# Forward packets received from the end hosts through the tunnels
tc qdisc add dev "${VETH_RTA_H1}" ingress
tc filter add dev "${VETH_RTA_H1}" ingress \
protocol ipv4 flower dst_ip 198.51.100.2 \
action tunnel_key set src_ip 192.0.2.0xab \
dst_ip 192.0.2.0xba id 10 \
action mirred egress redirect dev tunnel-rta
tc qdisc add dev "${VETH_RTB_H2}" ingress
tc filter add dev "${VETH_RTB_H2}" ingress \
protocol ipv4 flower dst_ip 198.51.100.1 \
action tunnel_key set src_ip 192.0.2.0xba \
dst_ip 192.0.2.0xab id 10 \
action mirred egress redirect dev tunnel-rtb
# Decapsulate packets received from the tunnels and send them to the
# end hosts
tc qdisc add dev tunnel-rta ingress
tc filter add dev tunnel-rta ingress matchall \
action vlan push_eth dst_mac "${MAC_H1_RTA}" \
src_mac "${MAC_RTA_H1}" \
action mirred egress redirect dev "${VETH_RTA_H1}"
tc qdisc add dev tunnel-rtb ingress
tc filter add dev tunnel-rtb ingress matchall \
action vlan push_eth dst_mac "${MAC_H2_RTB}" \
src_mac "${MAC_RTB_H2}" \
action mirred egress redirect dev "${VETH_RTB_H2}"
}
setup_base_net
setup_vxlan_gpe
ip vrf exec "${VRF_H1}" ping 198.51.100.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists