netdev - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 063/189] ipv6: use prandom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210706111409.2058071-63-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue,  6 Jul 2021 07:12:03 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Amit Klein <aksecurity@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 063/189] ipv6: use prandom_u32() for ID generation

From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>

[ Upstream commit 62f20e068ccc50d6ab66fdb72ba90da2b9418c99 ]

This is a complement to commit aa6dd211e4b1 ("inet: use bigger hash
table for IP ID generation"), but focusing on some specific aspects
of IPv6.

Contary to IPv4, IPv6 only uses packet IDs with fragments, and with a
minimum MTU of 1280, it's much less easy to force a remote peer to
produce many fragments to explore its ID sequence. In addition packet
IDs are 32-bit in IPv6, which further complicates their analysis. On
the other hand, it is often easier to choose among plenty of possible
source addresses and partially work around the bigger hash table the
commit above permits, which leaves IPv6 partially exposed to some
possibilities of remote analysis at the risk of weakening some
protocols like DNS if some IDs can be predicted with a good enough
probability.

Given the wide range of permitted IDs, the risk of collision is extremely
low so there's no need to rely on the positive increment algorithm that
is shared with the IPv4 code via ip_idents_reserve(). We have a fast
PRNG, so let's simply call prandom_u32() and be done with it.

Performance measurements at 10 Gbps couldn't show any difference with
the previous code, even when using a single core, because due to the
large fragments, we're limited to only ~930 kpps at 10 Gbps and the cost
of the random generation is completely offset by other operations and by
the network transfer time. In addition, this change removes the need to
update a shared entry in the idents table so it may even end up being
slightly faster on large scale systems where this matters.

The risk of at least one collision here is about 1/80 million among
10 IDs, 1/850k among 100 IDs, and still only 1/8.5k among 1000 IDs,
which remains very low compared to IPv4 where all IDs are reused
every 4 to 80ms on a 10 Gbps flow depending on packet sizes.

Reported-by: Amit Klein <aksecurity@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210529110746.6796-1-w@1wt.eu
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/ipv6/output_core.c | 28 +++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/output_core.c b/net/ipv6/output_core.c
index af36acc1a644..2880dc7d9a49 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/output_core.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/output_core.c
@@ -15,29 +15,11 @@ static u32 __ipv6_select_ident(struct net *net,
 			       const struct in6_addr *dst,
 			       const struct in6_addr *src)
 {
-	const struct {
-		struct in6_addr dst;
-		struct in6_addr src;
-	} __aligned(SIPHASH_ALIGNMENT) combined = {
-		.dst = *dst,
-		.src = *src,
-	};
-	u32 hash, id;
-
-	/* Note the following code is not safe, but this is okay. */
-	if (unlikely(siphash_key_is_zero(&net->ipv4.ip_id_key)))
-		get_random_bytes(&net->ipv4.ip_id_key,
-				 sizeof(net->ipv4.ip_id_key));
-
-	hash = siphash(&combined, sizeof(combined), &net->ipv4.ip_id_key);
-
-	/* Treat id of 0 as unset and if we get 0 back from ip_idents_reserve,
-	 * set the hight order instead thus minimizing possible future
-	 * collisions.
-	 */
-	id = ip_idents_reserve(hash, 1);
-	if (unlikely(!id))
-		id = 1 << 31;
+	u32 id;
+
+	do {
+		id = prandom_u32();
+	} while (!id);

 	return id;
 }
-- 
2.30.2