[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60e76331bf27e_653a42085@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2021 13:42:25 -0700
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] bpf: selftest to verify mixing bpf2bpf calls
and tailcalls with insn patch
Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 3:39 PM John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > -static volatile int count;
> > +int count = 0;
> > +int noise = 0;
> > +
> > +__always_inline int subprog_noise(void)
> > +{
> > + __u32 key = 0;
> > +
> > + bpf_printk("hello noisy subprog %d\n", key);
> > + bpf_map_lookup_elem(&nop_table, &key);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> This selftest patch I had to apply manually due to conflicts.
> I've also removed the noisy printk before pushing.
Thanks! I had the printk there to verify the code was actually
being run, but forgot to remove it before submitting.
> I verified that I saw the spam before removing it.
Great.
> The patch 1 looks great. Thanks a lot for the fix.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists