lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d8a97f9b-7d6b-839f-873c-f5f5f9c46eca@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Jul 2021 09:57:26 +0300
From:   Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
To:     Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
        Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        "Jamal Hadi Salim" <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com>,
        Baowen Zheng <baowen.zheng@...igine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v4 1/1] police: Add support for json output



On 2021-07-07 9:53 AM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 10:27:34AM +0200, Davide Caratti wrote:
>> my 2 cents:
>>
>> what about using PRINT_FP / PRINT_JSON, so we fix the JSON output only to show "index", and
>> preserve the human-readable printout iproute and kselftests? besides avoiding failures because
>> of mismatching kselftests / iproute, this would preserve functionality of scripts that
>> configure / dump the "police" action. WDYT?
> 
> +1
> 


why not fix the kselftest to look for the correct output?

all actions output unsigned as the index.
though I did find an issue with the fp output that you pasted
that I missed.


         action order 0: police   index 1 rate 1Kbit burst 10Kb mtu 2Kb 
action reclassify overhead 0 ref 1 bind 0


You asked about the \t before index and actually there is a missing
print_nl() call before printing index and the rest as in the other
actions.

then the match should be something like this

	"matchPattern": "action order [0-9]*: police.*index 0x1 rate 1Kbit 
burst 10Kb"

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ