netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 1/8] net: dsa: ocelot: remove unnecessary pci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210710195318.jq3xu2gkbttmcsfy@skbuf>
Date:   Sat, 10 Jul 2021 22:53:18 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        claudiu.manoil@....com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 1/8] net: dsa: ocelot: remove unnecessary
 pci_bar variables

On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:25:55PM -0700, Colin Foster wrote:
> The pci_bar variables for the switch and imdio don't make sense for the
> generic felix driver. Moving them to felix_vsc9959 to limit scope and
> simplify the felix_info struct.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>

Just one comment below.

>  drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.h         |  2 --
>  drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c | 11 +++++------
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.h b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.h
> index 4d96cad815d5..47769dd386db 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.h
> @@ -20,8 +20,6 @@ struct felix_info {
>  	int				num_ports;
>  	int				num_tx_queues;
>  	struct vcap_props		*vcap;
> -	int				switch_pci_bar;
> -	int				imdio_pci_bar;
>  	const struct ptp_clock_info	*ptp_caps;
>  
>  	/* Some Ocelot switches are integrated into the SoC without the
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
> index f966a253d1c7..182ca749c8e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
> @@ -1359,8 +1359,6 @@ static const struct felix_info felix_info_vsc9959 = {
>  	.num_mact_rows		= 2048,
>  	.num_ports		= 6,
>  	.num_tx_queues		= OCELOT_NUM_TC,
> -	.switch_pci_bar		= 4,
> -	.imdio_pci_bar		= 0,
>  	.quirk_no_xtr_irq	= true,
>  	.ptp_caps		= &vsc9959_ptp_caps,
>  	.mdio_bus_alloc		= vsc9959_mdio_bus_alloc,
> @@ -1388,6 +1386,9 @@ static irqreturn_t felix_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> +#define VSC9959_SWITCH_PCI_BAR 4
> +#define VSC9959_IMDIO_PCI_BAR 0
> +

I would prefer these to be declared right below

#define VSC9959_TAS_GCL_ENTRY_MAX	63

and aligned with it