lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 11 Jul 2021 20:39:45 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Qitao Xu <qitao.xu@...edance.com>,
        Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2] net_sched: introduce tracepoint trace_qdisc_enqueue()

On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 8:36 PM Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 11:23 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> > Sure, in that case a different packet is dropped, once again you
> > can trace it with kfree_skb() if you want. What's the problem?
> It's ok, but we can make it better. Yunsheng Lin may have explained why?

Why it is better to trace dropped packets both in enqueue and in kfree_skb()?
I fail to see it. You are just asking for duplications. If you do not see it by
yourself, it means you don't understand or need it at all. ;)

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ