[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b076d20cb378302543db6d15310a4059ded08ecf.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:37:24 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@...ek.ru>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] udp: check for encap using encap_enable
Hello,
On Mon, 2021-07-12 at 03:55 +0300, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> Usage of encap_type as a flag to determine encapsulation of udp
> socket is not correct because there is special encap_enable field
> for this check. Many network drivers use this field as a flag
> instead of correctly indicate type of encapsulation. Remove such
> usage and update all checks to use encap_enable field
Uhmm... this looks quite dangerous to me. Apparently l2tp and gtp clear
'encap_type' to prevent the rx path pushing pkts into the encap on
shutdown. Will such tunnel's shutdown be safe with the above?
> Fixes: 60fb9567bf30 ("udp: implement complete book-keeping for encap_needed")
IMHO this not fix. Which bug are you observing that is addressed here?
Thanks!
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists