netdev - Re: Use-after-free access in j1939_session

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e1f71c33-a5dd-82b1-2dce-be4f052d6aa6@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:35:19 +0200
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     Xiaochen Zou <xzou017@....edu>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Use-after-free access in j1939_session_deactivate

On 7/13/21 9:30 AM, Xiaochen Zou wrote:
> j1939_session_destroy() will free both session and session->priv. It
> leads to multiple use-after-free read and write in
> j1939_session_deactivate() when session was freed in
> j1939_session_deactivate_locked(). The free chain is
> j1939_session_deactivate_locked()->
> j1939_session_put()->__j1939_session_release()->j1939_session_destroy().
> To fix this bug, I moved j1939_session_put() behind
> j1939_session_deactivate_locked() and guarded it with a check of
> active since the session would be freed only if active is true.

Please include your Signed-off-by.
See
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.12/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L356

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)