[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD-N9QWmNYPkim_KrnUfvNhErUZaJqwGH-_3QvivVEvg+KnHjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:18:36 +0800
From: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] audit: fix memory leak in nf_tables_commit
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 11:31 PM Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
>
> Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > +static void nf_tables_commit_free(struct list_head *adl)
> > >
> > > nf_tables_commit_audit_free?
> >
> > What do you mean? Modify the name of newly added function to
> > nf_tables_commit_audit_free?
>
> Yes, this function is audit related, and it does the inverse
> of existing '...audit_alloc'.
Hi Florian,
I double-check the patch, and it seems there is no need to send a
followup patch (nf-next).
I will send a v3 patch with the new function name.
Best regards
Dongliang Mu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists