netdev - Re: [RFC][PATCH] PCI: Reserve address space for powered-off devices behind PCIe bridges

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210715195625.GA1992334@bjorn-Precision-5520>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:56:25 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     "Billie Alsup (balsup)" <balsup@...co.com>
Cc:     Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Guohan Lu <lguohan@...il.com>,
        "Madhava Reddy Siddareddygari (msiddare)" <msiddare@...co.com>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sergey Miroshnichenko <s.miroshnichenko@...ro.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PCI: Reserve address space for powered-off devices
 behind PCIe bridges

On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 07:49:56PM +0000, Billie Alsup (balsup) wrote:
>     >On 7/15/21, 11:57 AM, "Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
>     >Since you've gone to that much trouble already, also note
>     >http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html and
>     >https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette 
> 
> My apologies. I was just cc'd on a thread and blindly responded.  
> I didn't realize my mistake until receiving bounce messages for the html formatted message.
> 
>     >BTW, the attribution in the email you quoted below got corrupted in
>     >such a way that it appears that I wrote the whole thing, instead of 
>     >what actually happened, which is that I wrote a half dozen lines of
>     >response to your email.  Linux uses old skool email conventions ;)
> 
> I will pay closer attention next time.  Again, my apologies.
> Outlook really is a bad client for these types of emails!

Can't speak to Outlook, but so is Gmail :(  Thanks for starting the
conversation!

Bjorn