netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: add ambient BPF runtime context stored in current

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <162646364436.14878.13764135374807267506.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jul 2021 19:27:24 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...com,
        daniel@...earbox.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com, yhs@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: add ambient BPF runtime context stored in
 current

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:06:15 -0700 you wrote:
> b910eaaaa4b8 ("bpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in bpf_get_local_storage()
> helper") fixed the problem with cgroup-local storage use in BPF by
> pre-allocating per-CPU array of 8 cgroup storage pointers to accommodate
> possible BPF program preemptions and nested executions.
> 
> While this seems to work good in practice, it introduces new and unnecessary
> failure mode in which not all BPF programs might be executed if we fail to
> find an unused slot for cgroup storage, however unlikely it is. It might also
> not be so unlikely when/if we allow sleepable cgroup BPF programs in the
> future.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2,bpf-next] bpf: add ambient BPF runtime context stored in current
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c7603cfa04e7

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html