netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] libbpf: Introduce 'btf_custom_path' to 'bpf_obj_open

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0fa3b7f1-7928-eff9-1644-df3384171bcd@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Sat, 17 Jul 2021 09:15:50 +0800
From:   Shuyi Cheng <chengshuyi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] libbpf: Introduce 'btf_custom_path' to
 'bpf_obj_open_opts'



On 7/16/21 12:51 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 5:43 AM Shuyi Cheng
> <chengshuyi@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>> btf_custom_path allows developers to load custom BTF, and subsequent
>> CO-RE will use custom BTF for relocation.
>>
>> Learn from Andrii's comments in [0], add the btf_custom_path parameter
>> to bpf_obj_open_opts, you can directly use the skeleton's
>> <objname>_bpf__open_opts function to pass in the btf_custom_path
>> parameter.
>>
>> Prior to this, there was also a developer who provided a patch with
>> similar functions. It is a pity that the follow-up did not continue to
>> advance. See [1].
>>
>>          [0]https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzbJZLjNoiK8_VfeVg_Vrg=9iYFv+po-38SMe=UzwDKJ=Q@mail.gmail.com/#t
>>          [1]https://yhbt.net/lore/all/CAEf4Bzbgw49w2PtowsrzKQNcxD4fZRE6AKByX-5-dMo-+oWHHA@mail.gmail.com/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shuyi Cheng <chengshuyi@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h |  9 ++++++++-
>>   2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> index 1e04ce7..6e11a7b 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> @@ -498,6 +498,13 @@ struct bpf_object {
>>           * it at load time.
>>           */
>>          struct btf *btf_vmlinux;
>> +       /* Path to the custom BTF to be used for BPF CO-RE relocations.
>> +        * This custom BTF completely replaces the use of vmlinux BTF
>> +        * for the purpose of CO-RE relocations.
>> +        * NOTE: any other BPF feature (e.g., fentry/fexit programs,
>> +        * struct_ops, etc) will need actual kernel BTF at /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux.
>> +        */
> 
> this comment completely duplicates the one from bpf_object_open_opts,
> I'll remove or shorten it
> 
>> +       char *btf_custom_path;
>>          /* vmlinux BTF override for CO-RE relocations */
>>          struct btf *btf_vmlinux_override;
>>          /* Lazily initialized kernel module BTFs */
>> @@ -2645,10 +2652,6 @@ static bool obj_needs_vmlinux_btf(const struct bpf_object *obj)
>>          struct bpf_program *prog;
>>          int i;
>>
>> -       /* CO-RE relocations need kernel BTF */
>> -       if (obj->btf_ext && obj->btf_ext->core_relo_info.len)
>> -               return true;
>> -
>>          /* Support for typed ksyms needs kernel BTF */
>>          for (i = 0; i < obj->nr_extern; i++) {
>>                  const struct extern_desc *ext;
>> @@ -2665,6 +2668,13 @@ static bool obj_needs_vmlinux_btf(const struct bpf_object *obj)
>>                          return true;
>>          }
>>
>> +       /* CO-RE relocations need kernel BTF, only when btf_custom_path
>> +        * is not specified
>> +        */
>> +       if (obj->btf_ext && obj->btf_ext->core_relo_info.len
>> +               && !obj->btf_custom_path)
>> +               return true;
> 
> not sure why you moved it, I'll move it back to minimize code churn

You're right. 👍

regards,
Shuyi
> 
>> +
>>          return false;
>>   }
>>
> 
> [...]
>