netdev - Re: [PATCHv4 bpf-next 7/8] libbpf: Allow specification of "kprobe/function+offset"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YPSB5ot0iK57kkA6@krava>
Date:   Sun, 18 Jul 2021 21:32:54 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 bpf-next 7/8] libbpf: Allow specification of
 "kprobe/function+offset"

On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 06:42:05PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 2:45 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
> >
> > kprobes can be placed on most instructions in a function, not
> > just entry, and ftrace and bpftrace support the function+offset
> > notification for probe placement.  Adding parsing of func_name
> > into func+offset to bpf_program__attach_kprobe() allows the
> > user to specify
> >
> > SEC("kprobe/bpf_fentry_test5+0x6")
> >
> > ...for example, and the offset can be passed to perf_event_open_probe()
> > to support kprobe attachment.
> >
> > [jolsa: changed original code to use bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts
> > and use dynamic allocation in sscanf]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > index d93a6f9408d1..abe6d4842bb0 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > @@ -10348,6 +10348,7 @@ static int perf_event_open_probe(bool uprobe, bool retprobe, const char *name,
> >
> >  struct bpf_program_attach_kprobe_opts {
> >         bool retprobe;
> > +       unsigned long offset;
> >  };
> >
> >  static struct bpf_link*
> > @@ -10360,7 +10361,7 @@ bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(struct bpf_program *prog,
> >         int pfd, err;
> >
> >         pfd = perf_event_open_probe(false /* uprobe */, opts->retprobe, func_name,
> > -                                   0 /* offset */, -1 /* pid */);
> > +                                   opts->offset, -1 /* pid */);
> >         if (pfd < 0) {
> >                 pr_warn("prog '%s': failed to create %s '%s' perf event: %s\n",
> >                         prog->name, opts->retprobe ? "kretprobe" : "kprobe", func_name,
> > @@ -10394,12 +10395,31 @@ static struct bpf_link *attach_kprobe(const struct bpf_sec_def *sec,
> >                                       struct bpf_program *prog)
> >  {
> >         struct bpf_program_attach_kprobe_opts opts;
> > +       unsigned long offset = 0;
> > +       struct bpf_link *link;
> >         const char *func_name;
> > +       char *func;
> > +       int n, err;
> >
> >         func_name = prog->sec_name + sec->len;
> >         opts.retprobe = strcmp(sec->sec, "kretprobe/") == 0;
> >
> > -       return bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(prog, func_name, &opts);
> > +       n = sscanf(func_name, "%m[a-zA-Z0-9_.]+%lx", &func, &offset);
> 
> could have used %li here to support both +0xabc and +123 forms

ok

> 
> > +       if (n < 1) {
> > +               err = -EINVAL;
> > +               pr_warn("kprobe name is invalid: %s\n", func_name);
> > +               return libbpf_err_ptr(err);
> > +       }
> > +       if (opts.retprobe && offset != 0) {
> > +               err = -EINVAL;
> 
> leaking func here

ugh.. thanks

jirka

> 
> 
> > +               pr_warn("kretprobes do not support offset specification\n");
> > +               return libbpf_err_ptr(err);
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       opts.offset = offset;
> > +       link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(prog, func, &opts);
> > +       free(func);
> > +       return link;
> >  }
> >
> >  struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_uprobe(struct bpf_program *prog,
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >
>