[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM6PR08MB4376894A46B47B024F50FBB3F7E19@AM6PR08MB4376.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:16:53 +0000
From: Justin He <Justin.He@....com>
To: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.pkin@...il.com>
CC: Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
"GR-everest-linux-l2@...vell.com" <GR-everest-linux-l2@...vell.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
nd <nd@....com>, Shai Malin <malin1024@...il.com>,
Shai Malin <smalin@...vell.com>,
Prabhakar Kushwaha <pkushwaha@...vell.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] qed: fix possible unpaired spin_{un}lock_bh in
_qed_mcp_cmd_and_union()
Hi Prabhakar
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.pkin@...il.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2021 6:36 PM
> To: Justin He <Justin.He@....com>
> Cc: Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>; GR-everest-linux-l2@...vell.com;
> David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org>; nd <nd@....com>; Shai Malin <malin1024@...il.com>;
> Shai Malin <smalin@...vell.com>; Prabhakar Kushwaha <pkushwaha@...vell.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] qed: fix possible unpaired spin_{un}lock_bh in
> _qed_mcp_cmd_and_union()
>
> Hi Jia,
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 2:28 PM Jia He <justin.he@....com> wrote:
> >
> > Liajian reported a bug_on hit on a ThunderX2 arm64 server with FastLinQ
> > QL41000 ethernet controller:
> > BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/0:4/531/0x00000200
> > [qed_probe:488()]hw prepare failed
> > kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:2355!
> > Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
> > CPU: 0 PID: 531 Comm: kworker/0:4 Tainted: G W 5.4.0-77-generic #86-
> Ubuntu
> > pstate: 00400009 (nzcv daif +PAN -UAO)
> > Call trace:
> > vunmap+0x4c/0x50
> > iounmap+0x48/0x58
> > qed_free_pci+0x60/0x80 [qed]
> > qed_probe+0x35c/0x688 [qed]
> > __qede_probe+0x88/0x5c8 [qede]
> > qede_probe+0x60/0xe0 [qede]
> > local_pci_probe+0x48/0xa0
> > work_for_cpu_fn+0x24/0x38
> > process_one_work+0x1d0/0x468
> > worker_thread+0x238/0x4e0
> > kthread+0xf0/0x118
> > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
> >
> > In this case, qed_hw_prepare() returns error due to hw/fw error, but in
> > theory work queue should be in process context instead of interrupt.
> >
> > The root cause might be the unpaired spin_{un}lock_bh() in
> > _qed_mcp_cmd_and_union(), which causes botton half is disabled
> incorrectly.
> >
> > Reported-by: Lijian Zhang <Lijian.Zhang@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin.he@....com>
> > ---
>
> This patch is adding additional spin_{un}lock_bh().
> Can you please enlighten about the exact flow causing this unpaired
> spin_{un}lock_bh.
>
For instance:
_qed_mcp_cmd_and_union()
In while loop
spin_lock_bh()
qed_mcp_has_pending_cmd() (assume false), will break the loop
if (cnt >= max_retries) {
...
return -EAGAIN; <-- here returns -EAGAIN without invoking bh unlock
}
> Also,
> as per description, looks like you are not sure actual the root-cause.
> does this patch really solved the problem?
I don't have that ThunderX2 to verify the patch.
But I searched all the spin_lock/unlock_bh and spin_lock_irqsave/irqrestore
under driver/.../qlogic, this is the only problematic point I could figure
out. And this might be possible code path of qed_probe().
--
Cheers,
Justin (Jia He)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists