netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 02/16] memcg: enable accounting for IP address and routing-related objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJwJo6ZgXDoXevNRte4G3Phei8WcgJ897JebWDkQDnPYrgTTQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:00:42 +0100
From:   Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>
To:     Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/16] memcg: enable accounting for IP address and
 routing-related objects

Hi Vasily,

On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 11:45, Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
[..]
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index ae1f5d0..1bbf239 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ static __always_inline bool memcg_kmem_bypass(void)
>                 return false;
>
>         /* Memcg to charge can't be determined. */
> -       if (in_interrupt() || !current->mm || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
> +       if (!in_task() || !current->mm || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
>                 return true;

This seems to do two separate things in one patch.
Probably, it's better to separate them.
(I may miss how route changes are related to more generic
__alloc_pages() change)

Thanks,
           Dmitry