netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] Revert "qed: fix possible unpaired spin_{un}lock_bh in _qed_mcp_cmd_and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <162679140448.23944.13061540500790783692.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:30:04 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Jia He <justin.he@....com>
Cc:     aelior@...vell.com, GR-everest-linux-l2@...vell.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nd@....com, pkushwaha@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] Revert "qed: fix possible unpaired spin_{un}lock_bh in
 _qed_mcp_cmd_and_union()"

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):

On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:26:55 +0800 you wrote:
> This reverts commit 6206b7981a36476f4695d661ae139f7db36a802d.
> 
> That patch added additional spin_{un}lock_bh(), which was harmless
> but pointless. The orginal code path has guaranteed the pair of
> spin_{un}lock_bh().
> 
> We'd better revert it before we find the exact root cause of the
> bug_on mentioned in that patch.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net,v2] Revert "qed: fix possible unpaired spin_{un}lock_bh in _qed_mcp_cmd_and_union()"
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/91bed5565bba

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html