[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <162681480523.17696.5006485416633503610.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:00:05 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, morbo@...gle.com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/3] libbpf: btf typed data dumping fixes
(__int128 usage, error propagation)
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:49:50 +0100 you wrote:
> This series aims to resolve further issues with the BTF typed data
> dumping interfaces in libbpf.
>
> Compilation failures with use of __int128 on 32-bit platforms were
> reported [1]. As a result, the use of __int128 in libbpf typed data
> dumping is replaced with __u64 usage for bitfield manipulations.
> In the case of 128-bit integer values, they are simply split into
> two 64-bit hex values for display (patch 1).
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v2,bpf-next,1/3] libbpf: avoid use of __int128 in typed dump display
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a1d3cc3c5eca
- [v2,bpf-next,2/3] selftests/bpf: add __int128-specific tests for typed data dump
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a17553dde294
- [v2,bpf-next,3/3] libbpf: propagate errors when retrieving enum value for typed data display
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/720c29fca9fb
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists