lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 21 Jul 2021 23:58:09 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Cc:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: Allow decimal offset for kprobes

Allow to specify decimal offset in SEC macro, like:
  SEC("kprobe/bpf_fentry_test7+5")

Adding selftest for that.

Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                                |  2 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c       |  2 ++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c  | 11 +++++++++++
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index d46c2dd37be2..52f4f1d4f495 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -10424,7 +10424,7 @@ static struct bpf_link *attach_kprobe(const struct bpf_sec_def *sec,
 	func_name = prog->sec_name + sec->len;
 	opts.retprobe = strcmp(sec->sec, "kretprobe/") == 0;
 
-	n = sscanf(func_name, "%m[a-zA-Z0-9_.]+%lx", &func, &offset);
+	n = sscanf(func_name, "%m[a-zA-Z0-9_.]+%li", &func, &offset);
 	if (n < 1) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		pr_warn("kprobe name is invalid: %s\n", func_name);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
index 088b3653610d..02a465f36d59 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/get_func_ip_test.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ void test_get_func_ip_test(void)
 	 */
 #ifndef __x86_64__
 	bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test6, false);
+	bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test7, false);
 #endif
 
 	err = get_func_ip_test__load(skel);
@@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ void test_get_func_ip_test(void)
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test5_result, 1, "test5_result");
 #ifdef __x86_64__
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test6_result, 1, "test6_result");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test7_result, 1, "test7_result");
 #endif
 
 cleanup:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
index acd587b6e859..a587aeca5ae0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/get_func_ip_test.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ extern const void bpf_fentry_test3 __ksym;
 extern const void bpf_fentry_test4 __ksym;
 extern const void bpf_modify_return_test __ksym;
 extern const void bpf_fentry_test6 __ksym;
+extern const void bpf_fentry_test7 __ksym;
 
 __u64 test1_result = 0;
 SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1")
@@ -71,3 +72,13 @@ int test6(struct pt_regs *ctx)
 	test6_result = (const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test6 + 5;
 	return 0;
 }
+
+__u64 test7_result = 0;
+SEC("kprobe/bpf_fentry_test7+5")
+int test7(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+	__u64 addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx);
+
+	test7_result = (const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test7 + 5;
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.31.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists