lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:03:37 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/54] dt-bindings: bluetooth: broadcom: Fix clocks check

The original binding was mentioning that valid values for the clocks and
clock-names property were one or two clocks from extclk, txco and lpo,
with extclk being deprecated in favor of txco.

However, the current binding lists a valid array as extclk, txco and
lpo, with either one or two items.

While this looks similar, it actually enforces that all the device trees
use either ["extclk"], or ["extclk", "txco"]. That doesn't make much
sense, since the two clocks are said to be equivalent, with one
superseeding the other.

lpo is also not a valid clock anymore, and would be as the third clock
of the list, while we could have only this clock in the previous binding
(and in DTs).

Let's rework the clock clause to allow to have either:

 - extclk, and mark it a deprecated
 - txco alone
 - lpo alone
 - txco, lpo

While ["extclk", "lpo"] wouldn't be valid, it wasn't found in any device
tree so it's not an issue in practice.

Similarly, ["lpo", "txco"] is still considered invalid, but it's
generally considered as a best practice to fix the order of clocks.

Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
---
 .../bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.yaml        | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.yaml
index fbdc2083bec4..5aac094fd217 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.yaml
@@ -50,16 +50,29 @@ properties:
       by interrupts and "host-wakeup" interrupt-names
 
   clocks:
+    minItems: 1
     maxItems: 2
     description: 1 or 2 clocks as defined in clock-names below,
       in that order
 
   clock-names:
     description: Names of the 1 to 2 supplied clocks
-    items:
+    oneOf:
+      - const: extclk
+        deprecated: true
+        description: Deprecated in favor of txco
+
       - const: txco
+        description: >
+          external reference clock (not a standalone crystal)
+
       - const: lpo
-      - const: extclk
+        description: >
+          external low power 32.768 kHz clock
+
+      - items:
+          - const: txco
+          - const: lpo
 
   vbat-supply:
     description: phandle to regulator supply for VBAT
-- 
2.31.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists