netdev - Re: [PATCH][next] net: dsa: sja1105: remove redundant re-assignment of pointer table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210722200544.qvl3sj57qph2whrw@skbuf>
Date:   Thu, 22 Jul 2021 23:05:44 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] net: dsa: sja1105: remove redundant re-assignment
 of pointer table

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 08:15:29PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> The pointer table is being re-assigned with a value that is never
> read. The assignment is redundant and can be removed.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
> index 6618abba23b3..c65dba3111d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
> @@ -2157,8 +2157,6 @@ static int sja1105_build_vlan_table(struct sja1105_private *priv)
>  	if (!new_vlan)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	table = &priv->static_config.tables[BLK_IDX_VLAN_LOOKUP];
> -
>  	for (i = 0; i < VLAN_N_VID; i++)
>  		new_vlan[i].vlanid = VLAN_N_VID;
>  
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 

Oh my, what an interesting bug you uncovered.

That duplicate assignment was introduced in commit 3f01c91aab92 ("net:
dsa: sja1105: implement VLAN retagging for dsa_8021q sub-VLANs") and
used to read:

	table = &priv->static_config.tables[BLK_IDX_VLAN_LOOKUP];
	new_retagging = kcalloc(SJA1105_MAX_RETAGGING_COUNT,
				table->ops->unpacked_entry_size, GFP_KERNEL);

In retrospect, it should have been:

	table = &priv->static_config.tables[BLK_IDX_RETAGGING];

because we must allocate SJA1105_MAX_RETAGGING_COUNT elements of the
size of one VLAN retagging entry, and not of one VLAN lookup entry.

In commit 0fac6aa098ed ("net: dsa: sja1105: delete the
best_effort_vlan_filtering mode") I deleted everything that had to do
with VLAN retagging but left this behind because it didn't say RETAGGING
on it.

	[BLK_IDX_VLAN_LOOKUP] = {
		.unpacked_entry_size = sizeof(struct sja1105_vlan_lookup_entry),
	},
	[BLK_IDX_RETAGGING] = {
		.unpacked_entry_size = sizeof(struct sja1105_retagging_entry),
	},

and if you look at them, struct sja1105_retagging_entry has 7 u64
fields, while struct sja1105_vlan_lookup_entry has 6 elements (actually
since commit 3e77e59bf8cf ("net: dsa: sja1105: add support for the
SJA1110 switch family") it also has 7.

The point is, between commit 3f01c91aab92 and commit 3e77e59bf8cf, the
driver allocated 8 bytes too few per VLAN retagging entry, or multiplied
by 32 (the value of SJA1105_MAX_RETAGGING_COUNT), it only allocates
enough memory for 27.4 VLAN retagging entries. So any attempt to access
VLAN retagging entries 27-31 in this function would trigger an out of
bounds memory access.

Could you please also send a patch for the "net" tree with this, and the
explanation above?

-	table = &priv->static_config.tables[BLK_IDX_VLAN_LOOKUP];
+	table = &priv->static_config.tables[BLK_IDX_RETAGGING];

Thanks.