lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210723050302.GA30841@lst.de>
Date:   Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:03:02 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Boris Pismenny <borispismenny@...il.com>
Cc:     Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>, dsahern@...il.com,
        kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, saeedm@...dia.com,
        hch@....de, sagi@...mberg.me, axboe@...com, kbusch@...nel.org,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, edumazet@...gle.com, smalin@...vell.com,
        boris.pismenny@...il.com, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, benishay@...dia.com, ogerlitz@...dia.com,
        yorayz@...dia.com, Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>,
        Ben Ben-Ishay <benishay@...lanox.com>,
        Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
        Yoray Zack <yorayz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 02/36] iov_iter: DDP copy to iter/pages

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 11:23:38PM +0300, Boris Pismenny wrote:
> This routine, like other changes in this file, replicates the logic in
> memcpy_to_page. The only difference is that "ddp" avoids copies when the
> copy source and destinations buffers are one and the same.

Now why can't we just make that change to the generic routine?

If we can't, why do they not have a saner name documenting what they
actually do?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ