netdev - Re: [PATCH] bpf/tests: do not PASS tests without actually testing the result

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <162708660423.10005.5949427979169570088.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 24 Jul 2021 00:30:04 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        Tony.Ambardar@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf/tests: do not PASS tests without actually testing the
 result

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 12:38:22 +0200 you wrote:
> Each test case can have a set of sub-tests, where each sub-test can
> run the cBPF/eBPF test snippet with its own data_size and expected
> result. Before, the end of the sub-test array was indicated by both
> data_size and result being zero. However, most or all of the internal
> eBPF tests has a data_size of zero already. When such a test also had
> an expected value of zero, the test was never run but reported as
> PASS anyway.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - bpf/tests: do not PASS tests without actually testing the result
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2b7e9f25e590

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html