netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC v1 5/7] rtw88: Configure the registers from rtw_bf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 25 Jul 2021 23:36:13 +0200
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To:     Pkshih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
Cc:     "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tony0620emma@...il.com" <tony0620emma@...il.com>,
        "kvalo@...eaurora.org" <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "johannes@...solutions.net" <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Neo Jou <neojou@...il.com>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 5/7] rtw88: Configure the registers from
 rtw_bf_assoc() outside the RCU lock

Hi Ping-Ke,

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 7:47 AM Pkshih <pkshih@...ltek.com> wrote:
[...]
> The rcu_read_lock() in this function is used to access ieee80211_find_sta() and protect 'sta'.
> A simple way is to shrink the critical section, like:
>
>         rcu_read_lock();
>
>         sta = ieee80211_find_sta(vif, bssid);
>         if (!sta) {
>                 rtw_warn(rtwdev, "failed to find station entry for bss %pM\n",
>                          bssid);
>                 rcu_read_unlock();
>         }
>
>         vht_cap = &sta->vht_cap;
>
>         rcu_read_unlock();
I agree that reducing the amount of code under the lock will help my
use-case as well
in your code-example I am wondering if we should change
  struct ieee80211_sta_vht_cap *vht_cap;
  vht_cap = &sta->vht_cap;
to
  struct ieee80211_sta_vht_cap vht_cap;
  vht_cap = sta->vht_cap;

My thinking is that ieee80211_sta may be freed in parallel to this code running.
If that cannot happen then your code will be fine.

So I am hoping that you can also share your thoughts on this one.


Thank you and best regards,
Martin