[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210726153621.2658658-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:36:21 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH net] af_unix: fix garbage collect vs. MSG_PEEK
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Gc assumes that in-flight sockets that don't have an external ref can't
gain one while unix_gc_lock is held. That is true because
unix_notinflight() will be called before detaching fds, which takes
unix_gc_lock.
Only MSG_PEEK was somehow overlooked. That one also clones the fds, also
keeping them in the skb. But through MSG_PEEK an external reference can
definitely be gained without ever touching unix_gc_lock.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Note, this is a resend of this old submission that somehow fell through
the cracks:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAOssrKcfncAYsQWkfLGFgoOxAQJVT2hYVWdBA6Cw7hhO8RJ_wQ@mail.gmail.com/
and was never submitted "properly" and this issue never seemed to get
resolved properly.
I've cleaned it up and made the change much smaller and localized to
only one file. I kept Miklos's authorship as he did the hard work on
this, I just removed lines and fixed a formatting issue :)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 23c92ad15c61..cdea997aa5bf 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -1526,6 +1526,18 @@ static int unix_getname(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int peer)
return err;
}
+static void unix_peek_fds(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ scm->fp = scm_fp_dup(UNIXCB(skb).fp);
+
+ /* During garbage collection it is assumed that in-flight sockets don't
+ * get a new external reference. So we need to wait until current run
+ * finishes.
+ */
+ spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&unix_gc_lock);
+}
+
static int unix_scm_to_skb(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb, bool send_fds)
{
int err = 0;
@@ -2175,7 +2187,7 @@ static int unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
sk_peek_offset_fwd(sk, size);
if (UNIXCB(skb).fp)
- scm.fp = scm_fp_dup(UNIXCB(skb).fp);
+ unix_peek_fds(&scm, skb);
}
err = (flags & MSG_TRUNC) ? skb->len - skip : size;
@@ -2418,7 +2430,7 @@ static int unix_stream_read_generic(struct unix_stream_read_state *state,
/* It is questionable, see note in unix_dgram_recvmsg.
*/
if (UNIXCB(skb).fp)
- scm.fp = scm_fp_dup(UNIXCB(skb).fp);
+ unix_peek_fds(&scm, skb);
sk_peek_offset_fwd(sk, chunk);
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists