[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210726204413.652202f7@thinkpad>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 20:44:13 +0200
From: Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, sasha.neftin@...el.com,
vitaly.lifshits@...el.com, vinicius.gomes@...el.com,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Dvora Fuxbrumer <dvorax.fuxbrumer@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] igc: Export LEDs
On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 19:42:04 +0200
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com> wrote:
> I believe you must have misinterpreted some my of my statements.
> The whole effort behind LED naming unification was getting rid of
> hardware device names in favour of Linux provided device names.
Hi Jacek,
sorry about that. I don't know how this could have happened :D
Marek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists