| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20210726081738.1833704-9-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:17:32 +0200
From: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
To: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org
Cc: kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
Tony.Ambardar@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 08/14] bpf/tests: add tests for ALU operations implemented with function calls
32-bit JITs may implement complex ALU64 instructions using function calls.
The new tests check aspects related to this, such as register clobbering
and register argument re-ordering.
Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
---
lib/test_bpf.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 138 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index eb61088a674f..1115e39630ce 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -1916,6 +1916,144 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
{ },
{ { 0, -1 } }
},
+ {
+ /*
+ * Register (non-)clobbering test, in the case where a 32-bit
+ * JIT implements complex ALU64 operations via function calls.
+ */
+ "INT: Register clobbering, R1 updated",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R1, 123456789),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R2, 2),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R3, 3),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R4, 4),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R5, 5),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R6, 6),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R7, 7),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R8, 8),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R9, 9),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_DIV, R1, 123456789),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R0, 0, 10),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R1, 1, 9),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R2, 2, 8),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R3, 3, 7),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R4, 4, 6),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R5, 5, 5),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R6, 6, 4),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R7, 7, 3),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R8, 8, 2),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R9, 9, 1),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } }
+ },
+ {
+ "INT: Register clobbering, R2 updated",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R1, 1),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R2, 2 * 123456789),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R3, 3),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R4, 4),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R5, 5),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R6, 6),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R7, 7),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R8, 8),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R9, 9),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_DIV, R2, 123456789),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R0, 0, 10),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R1, 1, 9),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R2, 2, 8),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R3, 3, 7),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R4, 4, 6),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R5, 5, 5),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R6, 6, 4),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R7, 7, 3),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R8, 8, 2),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, R9, 9, 1),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } }
+ },
+ {
+ /*
+ * Test 32-bit JITs that implement complex ALU64 operations as
+ * function calls R0 = f(R1, R2), and must re-arrange operands.
+ */
+#define NUMER 0xfedcba9876543210ULL
+#define DENOM 0x0123456789abcdefULL
+ "ALU64_DIV X: Operand register permutations",
+ .u.insns_int = {
+ /* R0 / R2 */
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R0, NUMER),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R2, DENOM),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, R0, R2),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R0, NUMER / DENOM, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* R1 / R0 */
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, NUMER),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R0, DENOM),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, R1, R0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R1, NUMER / DENOM, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* R0 / R1 */
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R0, NUMER),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, DENOM),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, R0, R1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R0, NUMER / DENOM, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* R2 / R0 */
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R2, NUMER),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R0, DENOM),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, R2, R0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R2, NUMER / DENOM, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* R2 / R1 */
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R2, NUMER),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, DENOM),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, R2, R1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R2, NUMER / DENOM, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* R1 / R2 */
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, NUMER),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R2, DENOM),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, R1, R2),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R1, NUMER / DENOM, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R0, 1),
+ /* R1 / R1 */
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, NUMER),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, R1, R1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R1, 1, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* R2 / R2 */
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R2, DENOM),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, R2, R2),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R2, 1, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* R3 / R4 */
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R3, NUMER),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R4, DENOM),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, R3, R4),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R3, NUMER / DENOM, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* Successful return */
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ INTERNAL,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+#undef NUMER
+#undef DENOM
+ },
{
"check: missing ret",
.u.insns = {
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists