[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210727163024.GA2164561@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:30:24 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 27/31] dev_ioctl: split out ndo_eth_ioctl
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 03:45:13PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Most users of ndo_do_ioctl are ethernet drivers that implement
> the MII commands SIOCGMIIPHY/SIOCGMIIREG/SIOCSMIIREG, or hardware
> timestamping with SIOCSHWTSTAMP/SIOCGHWTSTAMP.
>
> Separate these from the few drivers that use ndo_do_ioctl to
> implement SIOCBOND, SIOCBR and SIOCWANDEV commands.
>
> This is a purely cosmetic change intended to help readers find
> their way through the implementation.
>
> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
> Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>
> Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
> Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst | 4 ++
> Documentation/networking/timestamping.rst | 6 +--
> drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c | 8 ++--
Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
ipoib is a convoluted, but this transform looks OK
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists