netdev - Re: [bpf-next v2 1/2] samples: bpf: Fix tracex7 error raised on the missing argument

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <162741000593.4520.5117531432819411073.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:20:05 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Juhee Kang <claudiajkang@...il.com>
Cc:     daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org,
        yhs@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bpf-next v2 1/2] samples: bpf: Fix tracex7 error raised on the
 missing argument

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 04:10:55 +0000 you wrote:
> The current behavior of 'tracex7' doesn't consist with other bpf samples
> tracex{1..6}. Other samples do not require any argument to run with, but
> tracex7 should be run with btrfs device argument. (it should be executed
> with test_override_return.sh)
> 
> Currently, tracex7 doesn't have any description about how to run this
> program and raises an unexpected error. And this result might be
> confusing since users might not have a hunch about how to run this
> program.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2,1/2] samples: bpf: Fix tracex7 error raised on the missing argument
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7d07006f0592
  - [bpf-next,v2,2/2] samples: bpf: Add the omitted xdp samples to .gitignore
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/05e9b4f60d31

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html