netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] nfp: flower-ct: fix error return code in nfp_fl_ct_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:56:35 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Louis Peens <louis.peens@...igine.com>
Cc:     Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, simon.horman@...igine.com,
        kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, yinjun.zhang@...igine.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] nfp: flower-ct: fix error return code in
 nfp_fl_ct_add_offload()

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:36:43AM +0200, Louis Peens wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2021/07/28 11:16, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> > If nfp_tunnel_add_ipv6_off() fails, it should return error code
> > in nfp_fl_ct_add_offload().
> > 
> > Fixes: 5a2b93041646 ("nfp: flower-ct: compile match sections of flow_payload")
> > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
> Ah, thanks Yang, I was just preparing a patch for this myself. This was first reported by
> Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> on 26 Jul 2021 (added to CC).
> 
> 	'Hello Louis Peens,
> 
> 	The patch 5a2b93041646: "nfp: flower-ct: compile match sections of
> 	flow_payload" from Jul 22, 2021, leads to the following static
> 	checker warning:
> 	.....'
> 
> I'm not sure what the usual procedure would be for this, I would think adding
> another "Reported-by" line would be sufficient?'

Just leave it, it's fine.

> 
> Anyway, for the patch itself the change looks good to me, thanks:
> Signed-off-by: Louis Peens <louis.peens@...igine.com>

Normally it would be Acked-by.  Signed-off-by means you handled the
patch and it's like signing a legal document that you didn't violate
SCO copyrights etc.

regards,
dan carpenter