netdev - [PATCH 00/14] bpf/tests: Extend the eBPF test suite

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210728170502.351010-1-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jul 2021 19:04:48 +0200
From:   Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
To:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org
Cc:     kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        Tony.Ambardar@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH 00/14] bpf/tests: Extend the eBPF test suite

This patch set extends the eBPF test suite in the test_bpf kernel module
to add more extensive tests of corner cases and new tests for operations
not previously covered.

An RFC patch set was previously submitted.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210726081738.1833704-1-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com/

Changes from RFC patch set:

* Changed tail call count limit test to comply with the new behavior of
  the interpreter, i.e. at most MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT tail calls are
  permitted.

* Fixed an uninitilized variable in tail call test error path, found by
  the Kernel test robot. Also fixed a warning due to pointer-to-u32 cast
  in IMM64 load instructions.

The checkpatch.pl script reports an error for the multi-line macro in
patch 14/14 ("bpf/tests: Add tail call test suite"). However, it cannot
be enclosed in parenthesis as suggested since it is an array element
initialization, similar the existing BPF_LD_IMM64() helper macro. It can
be replaced, but I do think the code and the intent is clearer this way.

Thanks,
Johan

Johan Almbladh (14):
  bpf/tests: Add BPF_JMP32 test cases
  bpf/tests: Add BPF_MOV tests for zero and sign extension
  bpf/tests: Fix typos in test case descriptions
  bpf/tests: Add more tests of ALU32 and ALU64 bitwise operations
  bpf/tests: Add more ALU32 tests for BPF_LSH/RSH/ARSH
  bpf/tests: Add more BPF_LSH/RSH/ARSH tests for ALU64
  bpf/tests: Add more ALU64 BPF_MUL tests
  bpf/tests: Add tests for ALU operations implemented with function
    calls
  bpf/tests: Add word-order tests for load/store of double words
  bpf/tests: Add branch conversion JIT test
  bpf/tests: Add test for 32-bit context pointer argument passing
  bpf/tests: Add tests for atomic operations
  bpf/tests: Add tests for BPF_CMPXCHG
  bpf/tests: Add tail call test suite

 lib/test_bpf.c | 2732 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 2475 insertions(+), 257 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1