[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQD8DcOeivPzLMkL@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 08:41:17 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Keith Packard <keithpac@...zon.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/64] ip: Use struct_group() for memcpy() regions
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:31:16AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > Why not use a local version of the macro like was done in the DRM header
> > file, to make it always work the same and more obvious what is
> > happening? If I were a userspace developer and saw the above, I would
> > think that the kernel developers have lost it :)
>
> Then don't take a look at this[1]. :p
>
> --
> Gustavo
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/c0a744dcaa29e9537e8607ae9c965ad936124a4d
That one at least looks a "little" different so maybe it could be seen
as semi-reasonable :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists