netdev - RE: [PATCH V2 net-next 2/7] dt-bindings: net: fsl,fec: add RGMII internal clock delay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DB8PR04MB6795819E4ED7FD43D740FC00E6EB9@DB8PR04MB6795.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jul 2021 02:30:18 +0000
From:   Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 net-next 2/7] dt-bindings: net: fsl,fec: add RGMII
 internal clock delay


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Sent: 2021年7月28日 22:08
> To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org; robh+dt@...nel.org;
> shawnguo@...nel.org; s.hauer@...gutronix.de; kernel@...gutronix.de;
> festevam@...il.com; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 2/7] dt-bindings: net: fsl,fec: add RGMII
> internal clock delay
> 
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 07:51:58PM +0800, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> 
> > +      The "enet_2x_txclk"(option), for RGMII sampling clock which fixed at
> 250Mhz.
> > +      The clock is required if SoC RGMII enable clock delay.
> 
> Hi Joakim
> 
> So you only need the clock if you are using RGMII delays? For RGMII without
> delays, the clock is not needed?
> 
> You might want to add a check in the C code that the clock is provided when
> needed.

Hi Andrew,

Yes, we only need this clock for RGMII delays, the clock is not needed for RGMII without delays.

Had better add below check to avoid enabling needless clock. 
	if (fep->rgmii_txc_dly || fep->rgmii_rxc_dly)

Best Regards,
Joakim Zhang
>      Andrew