netdev - Re: [PATCH 01/64] media: omap3isp: Extract struct group for memcpy() region

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Jul 2021 10:08:03 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>, dsterba@...e.cz,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Keith Packard <keithpac@...zon.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
        nborisov@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/64] media: omap3isp: Extract struct group for memcpy() region

On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 9:44 AM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 12:00:54PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 10:38:45AM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> > > Then is explicit memset the only reliable way accross all compiler
> > > flavors and supported versions?
> > >
> >
> > The = { } initializer works.  It's only when you start partially
> > initializing the struct that it doesn't initialize holes.
>
> No, partial works. It's when you _fully_ initialize the struct where the
> padding doesn't get initialized. *sob*

I'm pretty sure that this has more to do with whether or not the
compiler applies SROA then observes uses of the individual members or
not.

>
> struct foo {
>         u8 flag;
>         /* padding */
>         void *ptr;
> };
>
> These are fine:
>
> struct foo ok1 = { };
> struct foo ok2 = { .flag = 7 };
> struct foo ok3 = { .ptr = NULL };
>
> This is not:
>
> struct foo bad = { .flag = 7, .ptr = NULL };
>
> (But, of course, it depends on padding size, compiler version, and
> architecture. i.e. things remain unreliable.)
>
> --

-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers