netdev - [PATCH net 1/6] net: dsa: sja1105: fix static FDB writes for SJA1110

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210730171815.1773287-2-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Jul 2021 20:18:10 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/6] net: dsa: sja1105: fix static FDB writes for SJA1110

The blamed commit made FDB access on SJA1110 functional only as far as
dumping the existing entries goes, but anything having to do with an
entry's index (adding, deleting) is still broken.

There are in fact 2 problems, all caused by improperly inheriting the
code from SJA1105P/Q/R/S:
- An entry size is SJA1110_SIZE_L2_LOOKUP_ENTRY (24) bytes and not
  SJA1105PQRS_SIZE_L2_LOOKUP_ENTRY (20) bytes
- The "index" field within an FDB entry is at bits 10:1 for SJA1110 and
  not 15:6 as in SJA1105P/Q/R/S

This patch moves the packing function for the cmd->index outside of
sja1105pqrs_common_l2_lookup_cmd_packing() and into the device specific
functions sja1105pqrs_l2_lookup_cmd_packing and
sja1110_l2_lookup_cmd_packing.

Fixes: 74e7feff0e22 ("net: dsa: sja1105: fix dynamic access to L2 Address Lookup table for SJA1110")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
 .../net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_dynamic_config.c  | 27 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_dynamic_config.c b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_dynamic_config.c
index 56fead68ea9f..147709131c13 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_dynamic_config.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_dynamic_config.c
@@ -304,6 +304,15 @@ sja1105pqrs_common_l2_lookup_cmd_packing(void *buf, struct sja1105_dyn_cmd *cmd,
 			hostcmd = SJA1105_HOSTCMD_INVALIDATE;
 	}
 	sja1105_packing(p, &hostcmd, 25, 23, size, op);
+}
+
+static void
+sja1105pqrs_l2_lookup_cmd_packing(void *buf, struct sja1105_dyn_cmd *cmd,
+				  enum packing_op op)
+{
+	int entry_size = SJA1105PQRS_SIZE_L2_LOOKUP_ENTRY;
+
+	sja1105pqrs_common_l2_lookup_cmd_packing(buf, cmd, op, entry_size);
 
 	/* Hack - The hardware takes the 'index' field within
 	 * struct sja1105_l2_lookup_entry as the index on which this command
@@ -313,26 +322,18 @@ sja1105pqrs_common_l2_lookup_cmd_packing(void *buf, struct sja1105_dyn_cmd *cmd,
 	 * such that our API doesn't need to ask for a full-blown entry
 	 * structure when e.g. a delete is requested.
 	 */
-	sja1105_packing(buf, &cmd->index, 15, 6,
-			SJA1105PQRS_SIZE_L2_LOOKUP_ENTRY, op);
-}
-
-static void
-sja1105pqrs_l2_lookup_cmd_packing(void *buf, struct sja1105_dyn_cmd *cmd,
-				  enum packing_op op)
-{
-	int size = SJA1105PQRS_SIZE_L2_LOOKUP_ENTRY;
-
-	return sja1105pqrs_common_l2_lookup_cmd_packing(buf, cmd, op, size);
+	sja1105_packing(buf, &cmd->index, 15, 6, entry_size, op);
 }
 
 static void
 sja1110_l2_lookup_cmd_packing(void *buf, struct sja1105_dyn_cmd *cmd,
 			      enum packing_op op)
 {
-	int size = SJA1110_SIZE_L2_LOOKUP_ENTRY;
+	int entry_size = SJA1110_SIZE_L2_LOOKUP_ENTRY;
+
+	sja1105pqrs_common_l2_lookup_cmd_packing(buf, cmd, op, entry_size);
 
-	return sja1105pqrs_common_l2_lookup_cmd_packing(buf, cmd, op, size);
+	sja1105_packing(buf, &cmd->index, 10, 1, entry_size, op);
 }
 
 /* The switch is so retarded that it makes our command/entry abstraction
-- 
2.25.1