netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] nfc: hci: pass callback data param as pointer in nci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6f609952-cf76-58f9-1917-f06f3f376843@canonical.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:03:27 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-nfc@...ts.01.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] nfc: hci: pass callback data param as pointer in
 nci_request()

On 30/07/2021 15:58, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 15:56:19 +0200 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 30/07/2021 15:49, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> This generates a bunch of warnings:
>>>
>>> net/nfc/nci/core.c:381:51: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
>>> net/nfc/nci/core.c:388:50: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
>>> net/nfc/nci/core.c:494:57: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
>>> net/nfc/nci/core.c:520:65: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
>>> net/nfc/nci/core.c:570:44: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
>>> net/nfc/nci/core.c:815:34: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
>>> net/nfc/nci/core.c:856:50: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer  
>>
>> Indeed. Not that code before was better - the logic was exactly the
>> same. I might think more how to avoid these and maybe pass pointer to
>> stack value (like in other cases).
>>
>> The 7/8 and 8/8 could be skipped in such case.
> 
> We don't usually take parts of series, would you mind resending first 6
> or respinning with the warnings addressed?

Sure, no problem.


Best regards,
Krzysztof