lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 02 Aug 2021 13:30:08 +0000
To:     Vladimir Oltean <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/6] FDB fixes for NXP SJA1105


This series was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):

On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 20:18:09 +0300 you wrote:
> I have some upcoming patches that make heavy use of statically installed
> FDB entries, and when testing them on SJA1105P/Q/R/S and SJA1110, it
> became clear that these switches do not behave reliably at all.
> - On SJA1110, a static FDB entry cannot be installed at all
> - On SJA1105P/Q/R/S, it is very picky about the inner/outer VLAN type
> - Dynamically learned entries will make us not install static ones, or
>   even if we do, they might not take effect
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net,1/6] net: dsa: sja1105: fix static FDB writes for SJA1110
  - [net,2/6] net: dsa: sja1105: overwrite dynamic FDB entries with static ones in .port_fdb_add
  - [net,3/6] net: dsa: sja1105: invalidate dynamic FDB entries learned concurrently with statically added ones
  - [net,4/6] net: dsa: sja1105: ignore the FDB entry for unknown multicast when adding a new address
  - [net,5/6] net: dsa: sja1105: be stateless with FDB entries on SJA1105P/Q/R/S/SJA1110 too
  - [net,6/6] net: dsa: sja1105: match FDB entries regardless of inner/outer VLAN tag

You are awesome, thank you!
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists