lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 3 Aug 2021 07:05:52 -0400
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        oss-drivers@...igine.com, Baowen Zheng <baowen.zheng@...igine.com>,
        Louis Peens <louis.peens@...igine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] flow_offload: allow user to offload tc
 action to net device

On 2021-07-22 5:19 a.m., Simon Horman wrote:

Triggered by my observation on 2/3 went back and looked at this again to
see if we have same problem with notification on REPLACE case (I think
we do) but here's another comment:

> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcf_action_offload_cmd);
> +
>   /* Returns numbers of initialized actions or negative error. */
>   
>   int tcf_action_init(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp, struct nlattr *nla,
> @@ -1514,6 +1544,9 @@ static int tcf_action_add(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
>   		return ret;
>   	ret = tcf_add_notify(net, n, actions, portid, attr_size, extack);
>   
> +	/* offload actions to hardware if possible */
> +	tcf_action_offload_cmd(actions, extack);
> +

Above seems to be unconditional whether hw update is requested or not?
The comment says the right thing ("if possible") but the code
should have checked some sort of skip_sw check?

cheers,
jamal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists