lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue,  3 Aug 2021 16:23:16 +0800
From:   DENG Qingfang <>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <>
Cc:     Sean Wang <>,
        Landen Chao <>,
        Andrew Lunn <>,
        Vivien Didelot <>,
        Florian Fainelli <>,
        "David S. Miller" <>,
        Jakub Kicinski <>,
        Matthias Brugger <>,,,,,
        Eric Woudstra <>,
        René van Dorst <>,
        Frank Wunderlich <>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: dsa: mt7530: set STP state also on filter ID 1

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:00:06AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> So then change the port STP state only for FID 1 and resend. Any other
> reason why this patch series is marked RFC? It looked okay to me otherwise.

Okay, will resend with that change and without RFC.

By the way, if I were to implement .port_fast_age, should I only flush
dynamically learned FDB entries? What about MDB entries?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists