netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add tests for XDP bonding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Aug 2021 11:40:11 +0200
From:   Jussi Maki <joamaki@...il.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, j.vosburgh@...il.com,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>, vfalico@...il.com,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add tests for XDP bonding

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 2:19 AM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 6:24 AM <joamaki@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Jussi Maki <joamaki@...il.com>
> >
> > Add a test suite to test XDP bonding implementation
> > over a pair of veth devices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jussi Maki <joamaki@...il.com>
> > ---
>
> Was there any reason not to use BPF skeleton in your new tests? And
> also bpf_link-based XDP attachment instead of netlink-based?

Not really. I used the existing xdp_redirect_multi test as basis and
that used this approach. I'll give a go at changing this to use the
BPF skeletons.